# Critical Issue with Contract Address Handling on Starknet

**URL:** <https://community.starknet.io/t/critical-issue-with-contract-address-handling-on-starknet/115141>\
**Category:** 🙏 Help and Support\
**Created:** [December 9, 2024, 11:16pm UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/critical-issue-with-contract-address-handling-on-starknet/115141 "2024-12-09T23:16:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OdedSW](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/community.starknet.io/odedsw/32/85534_2.png) [@OdedSW](https://community.starknet.io/u/OdedSW)\
**Post date:** [December 25, 2024, 7:51am UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/critical-issue-with-contract-address-handling-on-starknet/115141/4 "2024-12-25T07:51:24Z")

</div>

There’s [SNIP-23](https://community.starknet.io/t/snip-23-mixed-case-checksum-address-encoding/114949/13) that tries to standardize a checksum approach (similar to Ethereum) for the `ContractAddress` type.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.starknet.io/t/critical-issue-with-contract-address-handling-on-starknet/115141)._