# \[DRAFT\] \[Reward: Airdrop\] WHO ARE REAL EARLY USERS?

**URL:** <https://community.starknet.io/t/draft-reward-airdrop-who-are-real-early-users/31868>\
**Category:** Provisions Discussions\
**Tags:** alpha\
**Created:** [March 18, 2023, 2:29am UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/draft-reward-airdrop-who-are-real-early-users/31868 "2023-03-18T02:29:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 39

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ManuAlzuru](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/community.starknet.io/manualzuru/32/3731_2.png) [@ManuAlzuru](https://community.starknet.io/u/ManuAlzuru)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2023, 8:21pm UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/draft-reward-airdrop-who-are-real-early-users/31868/39 "2023-03-24T20:21:07Z")

</div>

Would be great to merge the different discussions regarding possible distribution.

Here I comment why I think that having a clear structure for being eligible for an airdrop is bad. We need sybill resistance mechanisms for doing it properly!

> [@Airdrops farmers - sybil sinks](https://community.starknet.io/t/airdrops-farmers-sybil-sinks/54444/18):
>
> I’m not so sure I support what you are saying. I don’t think we should give incentivise for those that hit vanity fakeable metrics. The distribution should rather be to those having genuine interactions. What you are suggesting reminds me of web2 companies faking their KPIs to look good. With your suggestion Starknet would be incentivising those faking the metrics.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.starknet.io/t/draft-reward-airdrop-who-are-real-early-users/31868)._