# StarkNet Account Abstraction Model - Part 1

**URL:** <https://community.starknet.io/t/starknet-account-abstraction-model-part-1/781>\
**Category:** Starknet Technical Development\
**Tags:** conventions, alpha, accounts, protocol\
**Created:** [March 2, 2022, 12:24pm UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/starknet-account-abstraction-model-part-1/781 "2022-03-02T12:24:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lior-stark](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/community.starknet.io/lior-stark/32/14_2.png) [@lior-stark](https://community.starknet.io/u/lior-stark)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2022, 7:33am UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/starknet-account-abstraction-model-part-1/781/7 "2022-03-06T07:33:49Z")

</div>

This assumes we can, as mentioned [here](https://community.starknet.io/t/management-of-reverted-transactions-in-starknet/136#making-all-transactions-provable-3).

Even if we don’t we’ll need to have some (proven) operation that is implied by the failure, e.g. [the red fee](https://community.starknet.io/t/management-of-reverted-transactions-in-starknet/136#making-all-transactions-provable-3).

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.starknet.io/t/starknet-account-abstraction-model-part-1/781)._
