# What Starknet is gonna do about incompatibility of addresses deployed through terminal and addresses deployed with wallet extentions?

**URL:** <https://community.starknet.io/t/what-starknet-is-gonna-do-about-incompatibility-of-addresses-deployed-through-terminal-and-addresses-deployed-with-wallet-extentions/18864>\
**Category:** Starknet Technical Development\
**Created:** [March 15, 2023, 9:39pm UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/what-starknet-is-gonna-do-about-incompatibility-of-addresses-deployed-through-terminal-and-addresses-deployed-with-wallet-extentions/18864 "2023-03-15T21:39:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RASHMOR](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/community.starknet.io/rashmor/32/2658_2.png) [@RASHMOR](https://community.starknet.io/u/RASHMOR)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2023, 9:39pm UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/what-starknet-is-gonna-do-about-incompatibility-of-addresses-deployed-through-terminal-and-addresses-deployed-with-wallet-extentions/18864/1 "2023-03-15T21:39:23Z")

</div>

What Starknet is gonna do about incompatibility of addresses deployed through terminal and addresses deployed with wallet extentions? i mean both have private keys, but you can not import one to another(for example, private key from terminal can not be imported to the wallet). I see it it as a real issue

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![susanshuo](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/community.starknet.io/susanshuo/32/40448_2.png) [@susanshuo](https://community.starknet.io/u/susanshuo)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2023, 9:05pm UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/what-starknet-is-gonna-do-about-incompatibility-of-addresses-deployed-through-terminal-and-addresses-deployed-with-wallet-extentions/18864/2 "2023-03-16T21:05:21Z")

</div>

This is an issue that needs to be addressed, but I’d rather see starknet compatible with EVM sooner rather than later

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![btw](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/community.starknet.io/btw/32/16849_2.png) [@btw](https://community.starknet.io/u/btw)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 3:15am UTC](https://community.starknet.io/t/what-starknet-is-gonna-do-about-incompatibility-of-addresses-deployed-through-terminal-and-addresses-deployed-with-wallet-extentions/18864/3 "2023-03-17T03:15:28Z")

</div>

> [@RASHMOR](#):
>
> What Starknet is gonna do about incompatibility of addresses deployed through terminal and addresses deployed with wallet extentions? i mean both have private keys, but you can not import one to another(for example, private key from terminal can not be imported to the wallet). I see it it as a real issue

1. What is the root cause of this incompatibility issue? Is it due to technical limitations or design choices made by StarkNet?

2. Are there any plans to address this issue in the future? If so, what kind of solutions are being considered?

3. Could this incompatibility cause security risks, such as making it easier for private keys to be compromised?