Summary: Financial infrastructure as a public good
Starknet DAO’s governance and tokenomics illustrate an ongoing transition toward decentralized self-sustainability. The system benefits from significant technical innovations, such as Bitcoin-DeFi (BTCFi), zero-knowledge (ZK) technology, and multi-chain staking with robust incentive programs, and a roadmap for reducing core developer and foundation control.
However, public transparency, meritocratic voter participation, inflation management, and contributor alignment beyond token holding remain areas that would benefit from continued community scrutiny and reporting.
The DAO could further diversify its treasury assets, address delegate concentration, and prioritize participatory mechanisms and transparent reporting to achieve a resilient form of distributed stewardship. Research engagement, combined with commissioned operational stress tests and due diligence, could further enhance the already robust governance architecture.
Stakeholders should remain vigilant about incentives that may outweigh network utility, the evolution of administrative powers, and the funding of public goods to ensure the protocol’s long-term viability and alignment with broader ecosystem goals.
This brief invites direct participation from the community to actively engage in governance, surface operational insights, and commission external reviews as Starknet DAO continues its journey from centralized coordination to distributed resilience.
Introduction: Assessing Starknet DAO’s Sustainability
The pragmatic realities of blockchain tokenomics and the underlying relational dynamics that govern trust, shared responsibility, and long-term viability frame Starknet DAO as an interwoven living organism shaped by community action and economic forces.
This brief presents proprietary research by INCA, designed to inform Starknet DAO’s community and stakeholders about the current state of its governance and tokenomics, based on available documentation.
In the spirit of the Quechua principle of reciprocal accountability and collective welfare, a sustainable system must ensure that the benefits and burdens of its operation are fairly shared among all constituents.
Governance and Distributed Stewardship
Current governance dynamics show that decisions are influenced by a group of top holders and delegates who control nearly half of all available voting power. This heavy concentration is a common function of the standard one-token-one-vote method.
Recent engagement demonstrates low overall community involvement to approve proposals. From the perspective of relational governance, the lack of broad participation poses a challenge to the ideals of distributed authority.
The system is protected against catastrophic takeovers, as the cost to buy enough voting power to seize the treasury is high, acting as a powerful financial safeguard. However, a specific group of core decision-makers holds a single point of executive control that can temporarily halt any community-approved vote or action in an emergency. In standard operation, once the community approves a major change, there is a two- to three-day delay before the change is officially implemented.
A risk arises because delegates can quickly change where their votes are sent, creating sudden, untraceable shifts in influence that can alter vote outcomes without justification.
Furthermore, the technical efforts to connect the system with both the Bitcoin network and the Ethereum Virtual Machine introduce a unique layer of structural and governance risk. For protection, the core code is regularly inspected by security experts, but details on the complete third-party review are not easily accessible, suggesting an area for improved public transparency.
The organization has not established a legal shield for its participants and is based on offshore legal principles, exposing community members to potential shared legal liability.
Tokenomics: Inflation Outpaces Revenue
The project’s financial flows reflect a system still in its growth phase, where planned token sales from the grant program exceed the income generated from network operations, resulting in a consistent financial outflow. The rewards given are a continuous source of inflation, as funds used to support new projects and developers are continuously drawn from the minting of tokens. Additionally, rewards given to those who lock up their tokens to secure the network periodically increase the overall token supply.
The primary tool to counteract this is the fee-burning mechanism, where a portion of all transaction fees is immediately destroyed. Nevertheless, the main plan to increase the token’s value involves requiring stakers to lock up their capital for weeks to help secure the system.
Notably, the system rewards its builders differently: developers and contributors receive stablecoin after achieving goals, which encourages genuine, long-term contributions.
A significant financial vulnerability is that the treasury holds most of its wealth in its own token, meaning the health of the community funds is highly dependent on the token’s market price. A major competitor also follows this high-risk strategy of holding a large portion of its reserve funds in its native token, indicating that this is a common, though concerning, industry practice. In contrast, a leading competitor funds its public goods with less reliance on continuous inflation, setting a higher benchmark for financial prudence.
Conclusion
Ultimately, Starknet DAO’s evolving ecosystem exemplifies the dialectic between centralized coordination and decentralized ideals. Viewing governance and tokenomics as intertwined processes embedded within a relational community redefines success metrics beyond short-term transactions or vote counts.
Besides technical upgrades or token allocations, embracing distributed stewardship means cultivating a culture where diverse voices converge into a resilient organization, and where economic incentives harmonize with the shared commitment to accountability, adaptability, and equity.
The Imperative for Evidence-Based Governance
This brief is a public preview intended to inform the community. A detailed due diligence report with findings, verifiable evidence, granular data, and actionable, strategic advice is available through a formal consultancy or research.
Delegates, governance bodies, and key stakeholders are invited to commission Technical Due Diligence Reports to access specialized intelligence for optimization and competitive advantage.
© 2025 INCA. All rights reserved.
