Calling for improvement proposals for StarkGate

Hi Community -
We’re working on a new major version of StarkGate - our token bridge - and we’re planning to re-audit and deploy new bridge contracts in the next couple of months. One of the new features on the roadmap, for example, is allowing L1 deposits to call L2 functions so that dApps could offer an atomic operation of “deposit tokens from L1 + do something with the tokens on L2”.

We encourage the community to suggest new functionality to StarkGate. If you have any ideas or requests that would make the bridge more useful, we’d appreciate your thoughts!

4 Likes

Not exactly new functionality, rather completion of existing ones:

  • deposit cancellation
  • bridge should not have the absolute power to selectively burn(permissionedBurn) user funds
3 Likes