Don't eliminate real users to catch sybil

[andytoni]

Good evening everyone, I think it is normal for a user to perhaps use a metamask address to perform native bridges on both starknet wallets.
As I think it is normal to try and test both wallets to understand which one is better with. I don’t think that a chain like starknet will go after the sybil also because listening to their live broadcasts has always conveyed the concept of the importance of the community.

[cryptocafe]

@serpenson

Hey everyone! I would like to clarify one point and please let me know your opinion.

First of all let me tell you that I am not a airdrop hunter with multiple wallets, but when I tell you the situation I am in, it can be considered an airdrop hunter with a multiple wallets (hopefully not )

I am a person who would likes to try new things, and I am a blockchain and NFT enthusiast.

6 months ago, I installed an argent wallet in my old computer, and did some transactions such as minting a starknet ID. Then I bought a new laptop, and installed the argent wallet, but while installing the argent wallet, I didnt realise it was a new address and I started to use it. A couple of months later I saw there is another wallet called Braavos, so I installed it too.

Long story short, as can be understood I sent $ETH from 1 metamask address to 3 different starknet wallets. I don’t use argent wallets, and I only use Braavos wallet, because i liked it more.

So now, if there will be an airdrop, Would I be considered an airdrop hunter with multiple wallets because I sent funds from 1 metamask to 3 different starknet wallets?

I really would like to know what you think?

I believe that active participation on Discord and forums, along with the quantity and frequency of transactions, eliminates genuine Sybil actors. It’s impossible to carry out all these actions across multiple wallets. I think these criteria should be considered.

[bitcouin]

@cryptocafe

I believe that active participation on Discord and forums, along with the quantity and frequency of transactions, eliminates genuine Sybil actors. It’s impossible to carry out all these actions across multiple wallets. I think these criteria should be considered.

You’re not gonna get an airdrop bc you posted here so please stop spamming.

[cryptocafe]

I’m not spamming I’m sharing my point of view! So stop being rude and be respectful of other point of views

[harmony1]

It seems to me that if you have several linked wallets in one network, but they are very active, you should not be afraid of anything, because the developers are likely to consider that these are accounts of your friends or someone close to you.