How about the real interactions between the discussions in stead of on-chain activity?
If the person can demonstrate who he is the real person by something. Then that user can gain more.
I used starknet when it was testnet and mainnet alpha. At that time the network is extremely slow and some time got stuck, failed. :-s
I still donāt know how to count early users who had to abandon their old wallet addresses due to early wallet updates?
Shouldnāt everyone here be considered an early user? I know it is the ultimate challenge, but from a fundamental standpoint, canāt we reward all non sybl early adopters? Even like $250 is enough to change someoneās entire trajectory.
I would say the folks who used the platform, invested early and carried out the early testnet tasks,
Letās also not forget the community and developers
Optimismās batch selection doesnāt seem to be working the best so far, Arbitrum chose to go the other way and is still way ahead. I canāt judge the two, I personally prefer the latter.
A good community base and word of mouth is what keeps the project moving forward.
I think we must favor users who believed in the project from the start and who helped the project to be considered. there needs to be a filter in time, those who appeared on the project just because they heard the rumor that an airdrop was coming soon should already be ruled out.
I also agree with your words, testnet and dev should be multipliers
Am i early user if i start more than 12 months ago. Have multiple transactions, just have not been too active last month. But had more than 3 months in a row very active and still did not get any allocations of STRK token.
I do not understand why tokens were distributed so irrationally among starknet users, all dissatisfaction is justified because the criterion with a residual balance is never correct. I hope in the second round they will at least make compensation for gas payments. We are waiting for the final decision on the second round of distribution.
Bro, what happened to your NFT platform?