I agree but the third point is stupid
Since a person can withdraw money at the time of the picture
Noda has nothing to do with it either.
1 Like
Point 5 is wrong, I donât think late forum registrants are eligible for airdrop incentives On the contrary, those who contribute to the forum are eligible for airdrop incentives
Personally, I think the last point is very unreasonable. I am a loyal starknet user, and I just registered in the starknet forum recently. I was busy with work and didnât pay much attention to it. Is it necessary to deprive airdrop incentives? Sir, I donât think this is reasonable.
Early-stage interaction costs are expensive, and early users should be properly motivated by gas costs and transaction totalsstrong text
I object to the fifth point, the registration forum should not be the registration time period to determine the qualification of the airdrop, but the contribution to the governance of starknet
In my opinion, it is essential to carefully evaluate the mainnet activity as a key criteria when discussing potential airdrops on the StarkNet forum.
What if snapshots are taken weekly over a certain period of time. There will be a base amount and the weekly snapshot will act as multipliers.
I use the network much earlier. On the forum recently. Point 5, I donât like it. And it will be a shame if it is implemented.
I think testnet users have contributed a lot. They made huge contributions in the early stage of starknet, which includes time cost and risk cost, so testnet users should get some airdrop incentives
I think it would be nice to give a lot of benefits to transcription and Dao participants. Also, even if itâs a test four, letâs give it a prize of effort if youâve made steady efforts.
- Starknet Bridge users
- The first transaction on the Ethereum network was made before the launch of the Starknet mainnet
The test network is subject to Sybil attacks hundreds of times more than the mainnet. Based on this, rewarding them is even more stupid.
Based on the current development stage of blockchain technology, I believe that many people are looking forward to the expansion and extension of this technology. Everyone should give airdrop rewards with different weights to the project at different stages.
I agree with your point of view. I think testnet users are very important to the development of the entire project from the beginning, and they are an inseparable part. The early starknet testnet was very slow, which included the time cost of testnet users. I am optimistic about starknet. project, I will sacrifice my time to interact with the testnet, so testnet users should get airdrop incentives
The test network is subject to Sybil attacks hundreds of times more than the mainnet. Based on this, rewarding them is even more stupid.
I think this is contrary to decentralization. You should use what you have the way you want. But it can be considered in a piecemeal way
You can also bridge to just test how the ui ux en f the bridge is how long it takes, being interested in how long transfers take. And want to have your funds bridged to see if you find out more things to try in the process.interested people did not bridge for the airdrop.
thats right, making the starknet related eco more useful and friendly is more important than droping token now. we should have patient to grow together with starknet. 
According to my opinion, airdrop (if any) criteria should be only including KZG Ceremony contributor with Starknet user. By doing this airdrop will received by real user not sybils.
From my perspective, the best way to weed out the Sybil is âweakening the value of tokensâ. I donât know when it started, airdrop became a mustand everyone is expecting that. The aim of airdrop is to encourage the early engagement and support, not only the community members but also the developers. I expect that the airdrop can lead the ecosystem to the positive way. Otherwise, most of the users will suddenly leave Starknet after the airdrop.